Fatcow Icon
Moffett’s arrest raises more questions at board meeting
by Nathan Jeffers
njeffers@heartlandpublications.com
Apr 20, 2012 | 5577 views | 3 3 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print

POINT PLEASANT — On Thursday evening, concerns about Cameron Moffett’s employment with Mason County Schools were discussed once again.

During open session, Morty Gilley spoke to the board in regards to Moffett’s arrest and the charge of felony child abuse, and posed several questions. Before Gilley stated his questions, he made clear this was only his opinion, and not the opinion of anyone else in his family, or who he works for.

Gilley stated he wasn’t there to judge anyone and that he felt this situation has been too much in the public’s eye. His questions regarding Moffett included the following:

  • Why do we still have a principal that has been charged with child abuse still in the system?
  • Why hasn’t he be put on administrative leave?

Gilley went on to list several other individuals from the school system who had been arrested and/or charged with a variety of offenses, and stated those individuals had been placed on administrative leave. Gilley also had some questions regarding the child, Zachary Plants, and the actual incident on the school bus. Those questions were as follows:

  • Why wasn’t this child put in an alternative school if he was considered to be a problem?
  • Was there a PRO officer present the day of the incident, and if there was, why wasn’t he called instead of Mr. Moffett?

Gilley also addressed Superintendent Suzanne Dickens regarding an email she had sent to her administrative staff, claiming that in the email, she had asked her staff to attend a board meeting to show support for Moffett.

Immediately following these questions and statements in open session, the board adjourned into executive session with Gilley to discuss personnel matters. After a return to open session, board members continued with the business portion of the meeting, approving several agenda and personnel items. Following adjournment of the meeting, Gilley said the board had answered his questions, and that he was satisfied. Dickens also spoke exclusively with the Point Pleasant Register, and commented on Gilley’s questions that were made in open session.

“I’m glad that we could answer his questions and that he was satisfied with our answers,” Dickens said. “There’s so much misinformation being given out in the community by persons who do not have first-hand information, as well as the media.”

Moffett was arrested in March on a charge of felony child abuse by the Point Pleasant Police Department. A preliminary hearing for Moffett is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. on Monday, April 23, in Mason County Magistrate Court. At this hearing, it will be determined if there is probable cause for the case to continue into Mason County Circuit Court.

In addition to Superintendent Dickens, board members present were Michael Cottrill, Thomas Nunnery, Randy Searls, Dale Shobe, and Matthew Thompson. The Mason County School Board will meet again for a regular business meeting at 6 p.m. on April 24 at the Mason County Career Center.



Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
teresa.turner.
|
April 28, 2012
Hi my name is Teresa turner from Lewis county and iam really upset with what i saw because i go to Lewis county high school and i had a class and it was taking care of special needs children and they are the sweetest people i have ever worked with or socialized with.. this was uncalled for and makes all principals around the world look horrible and probably makes parents not trust them to keep their children safe.. I feel the way he should of handled this situation is to sit down and talk to the boy for one and for two no other man or person should lay their hand on someone else's child regardless on what is going on.. this made me so mad and upset all at the same time and i also feel that the teacher was in the wrong her self and should be charged as well because she did not stop it and she allowed the principal to do this to this young man in front of all those other children.. she should of not only be a teacher there but she should of also protected her student like a teacher is suppose to do.. i hope this man never teaches in another school district because special needs children are people just like anyone of us and should be treated with respect and treated like we are.. thank u very much Teresa turner..
TEEBS
|
April 22, 2012
I am a citizen and Grandparent with 3 children attending schools in this County. I have several comments: To start - this whole article is nothing short of "mind-blowing"! Why, pray tell, did Morty Gilley get an exclusive round in executive session over this specific matter? Maybe I am missing something here - who is he to warrant such treatment? Why is the Superintendent not responding to the community as a whole in response to Mr. Gilley's questions? I do not care about the issue of personnel matters any longer - this is way past that level - the public has a right to know the answers to these questions - PERIOD! The Superintendent's handling of this matter is nothing short of atrocius for an administrator. Right, wrong or indifferent, one's opinion of what Moffet allegedly did is irrelevant - there was enough information on the video to warrant him being placed on full administrative leave with pay IMMEDIATELY until the investigation was completed. Further, no administrator with any credibility would take sides in a matter of this nature - she has clearly done this or is the media all wrong? If these observations are inaccurate, why is she not going on the record to correct them? This incident alone, and its subsequent mis-handling, create a strong lack of confidence in the adminstation of our school system, by myself and many others. I could go on with this forever, but this is just a comment section. There are a lot of unanswered questions that need to be addressed. Make no mistake, I would love to be "satisfied" with some responses as well - but why are we, the public, not getting them?? The most important thing is always the children - we can easily lose sight of this. Yet, in order to protect and educate the kids, the system has to function with responsibility and a high degree of transparency.
curryrussell
|
April 21, 2012
So if the paper was given exclusive information, why isn't it shared here? You have posted all of the questions, but none of the answers! We are all waiting to hear what is going to happen in this situation. Some of us are so aggravated that our school leadership have no authority what so ever and now that our children can cry wolf, hold a situation hostage, or go further and injure teachers, they will have full control if this man is released or found guilty. I am sick of the system that is in place. We have more interest to put kids in some time out system, expel them, or baby them rather than educate them. And guess what, education includes discipline. Some of us want to know why this child wasn't charged with disorderly conduct or menacing. This Principal is a perfect example of how a Principal should take charge and not have to involve the Police. But time has changed and children need babied. Let's give our teachers and principals the reins back and let them teach our children!!!
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: